HighValueLowThreats [U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service] Full Details
This dataset was automatically cataloged from the provider's ArcGIS Hub. In some cases, information shown here may be incorrect or out-of-date. Click the 'Visit Source' button to search for items on the original provider's website.
Attribute | Value |
---|---|
Click on map to inspect values |
Full Details
- Title:
- HighValueLowThreats [U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service]
- Description:
- A great deal of collaboration is currently occurring among individuals, companies, organizations, and agencies in the region. However, there are many places on the landscape where key threats and stressors to habitats, such as land conversion and climate impacts, require focused efforts and discussion to make efficient use of limited resources to move the conservation needle while maintaining working lands.This dataset is a combination of coastal forest threats and conservation value.Threats: can be seen here:http://eemsonline.org/?model=sHuQLRfIhFh9oE2czQD95yyHskXkvjlSData Used: Housing Density: Theobald, D. 2005. Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecology and Society 10(1): 32. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art32/). National Park Service. 2010. NPScape housing measure - Phase 1 metrics processing SOP: Current housing density, historic housing density, and projected housing density metrics. National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center. Fort Collins, Colorado. Natural Resource Report. NPS/NRPC/IMD/NRR—2010/251. Published Report-2165448. Terrestrial Resilience Stratified by Land Facet and Ecoregion (Pacific Northwest): Buttrick, S., K. Popper, M. Schindel, B. McRae, B. Unnasch, A. Jones, and J. Platt. 2015. Conserving Nature's Stage: Identifying Resilient Terrestrial Landscapes in the Pacific Northwest. The Nature Conservancy, Portland, Oregon. 104 pp. Available online at: http://nature.ly/resilienceNW March 3, 2015. Conversion Potential: Wilson, T.S., Sleeter, B.M., Sleeter, R. R., Soulard, C.E. 2014, Land use threats and protected areas: a scenario-based landscape level approach, Land, 3 (2): 362-389 "Conversion potential into developed, agriculture and forest harvest lands in the Pacific Northwest from 2000 to 2100. Values 1-7 represent the number of scenarios projecting land-use conversion over the modeled period." Data inputs in Model: Terrestrial Resilience Stratified by Land Facet and Ecoregion = Average Climate Change Resilience - in model used not tool to identify areas that are not as resilient to climate change. Conversion Potential = average Conversion Potential Housing Density = Average housing density increase. Used raster calculator to determine areas with an increase in housing density between 2100 and 2010. Weighted union for Increase in development Housing density increase (weight 1) and conversion potential (weight 0.5). Thresholds: Used first and third quartile values unless stated otherwise. If the first and third quartile were both zero then the third quartile value was taken from array with just HUCs with values.Conservation Value: can be seen here:http://eemsonline.org/?model=XsCKKBhKtQt5i8i020cwQfY0JFkHTCjBData Used: WGA CHAT: State Wildlife Agencies of the Western United States. West-wide Crucial Habitat Data Set. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool: Mapping Fish and Wildlife Across the West. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Published 12/02/2013. Accessed November 2017. http://www.wafwachat.org Theobald Landscape Condition Index: Theobald et al 2013: metadata: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/55538c61e4b0a92fa7e94d0e OmniScape current flow: McRae, B.H., K. Popper, A. Jones, M. Schindel, S. Buttrick, K. Hall, R.S. Unnasch, and J. Platt. 2016. Conserving Nature's Stage: Mapping Omnidirectional Connectivity for Resilient Terrestrial Landscapes in the Pacific Northwest. The Nature Conservancy, Portland Oregon. 47 pp. Available online at: http://nature.org/resilienceNW June 30, 2016. Bird density data: American Bird Conservancy, Klamath Bird Observatory, PRBO Conservation Science Veloz, S., L. Salas, B. Altman, J. Alexander, D. Jongsomjit, N. Elliott, D. Moody, S. Michaile, M. Fitzgibbon and G. Ballard. 2013. Projected effects of climate change on the distribution and abundance of North Pacific birds and their habitats. Final report to the North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperative. Data inputs in Model: Percent area WGA CHAT intact_LS = Core Areas in model Average Theobald Landscape Condition Index = Landscape Condition Average of normalized Current Density of Townsend's Warbler, Olive-Sided Flycatcher, and Brown Creeper = Average Bird density Bird's were picked to represent different forest types Late successional - Brown Creeper; Mid Successional - Townsend's Warbler; Early successional - Olive-Sided Flycatcher. Minimum WGA CHAT SOC ter_soc and aq_soc = Species of Concern Percent Area Diffuse Current Flow = Diffuse Connectivity Thresholds: Used first and third quartile values unless stated otherwise. If the first and third quartile were both zero then the third quartile value was taken from array with just HUCs with values.
- Creator:
- Department of the Interior
- Provider:
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Open Data
- Resource Class:
- Web services
- Temporal Coverage:
- Last modified 2018-03-12
- Date Issued:
- 2018-03-12
- Place:
- Rights:
- The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. While the Service makes every reasonable effort to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data provided for distribution, it may not have the necessary accuracy or completeness required for every possible intended use. The Service recommends that data users consult the associated metadata record to understand the quality and possible limitations of the data. The Service creates metadata records in accordance with the standards endorsed by the Federal Geographic Data Committee. As a result of the above considerations, the Service gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data in a manner consistent with the limitations of geospatial data in general and these data in particular. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the Service, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the utility of the data on another system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This applies to the use of the data both alone and in aggregate with other data and information.
- Access Rights:
- Public
- Format:
- File
- Language:
- English
- Date Added:
- 2023-08-11